Showing posts with label Edward M. Lerner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Edward M. Lerner. Show all posts

Friday, September 6, 2019

Paradise Unbound, by Edward M. Lerner

[Analog]
★★★★☆ Exciting Hard SF Thriller

(Lost Colony Apocalypse) The Paradise colony was finally making a success of things when they discovered an incoming asteroid would wipe them out. But there’s still hope. (7,039 words; Time: 23m)

Recommended By: πŸ‘STomaino+1 (Q&A)


Thursday, May 2, 2019

The Gates of Paradise, by Edward M. Lerner

[Analog]
★★★☆☆ Average

(Lost Colony; Paradise) Cam travels on Paradise’s first space launch to investigate the “Big Ship” that supposedly brought their ancestors here thousands of years ago and which will fall from orbit in just days. (6,349 words; Time: 21m)

Recommended By: πŸ‘STomaino+1 (Q&A)


Monday, January 7, 2019

Clockwork Cataclysm, by Edward M. Lerner

[Analog]
Not Rated No Speculative Element

(Mainstream) They swarmed in their millions, like lemmings, like locusts, like a zombie apocalypse, but for what? (219 words; Time: 00m)


Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Harry and the Lewises, by Edward M. Lerner

[Analog]
★★★☆☆ Honorable Mention

(SF Thriller) Ted’s tired of writing trash for a tabloid, so he takes an offer to research something strange that happened during the Lewis and Clarke expedition—stranger than anything even the tabloid ever printed. (22,869 words; Time: 1h:16m)


Wednesday, October 25, 2017

The Pilgrimage, by Edward M. Lerner

Find this issue
(SF Humor) The narrator prepares to say farewell to his best, most-trusted friend. (587 words; Time: 01m)

Rating: ★★★☆☆ Average

Thursday, August 24, 2017

My Fifth and Most Exotic Voyage, by Edward M. Lerner

Find this issue
(SF Adventure Pastiche) In which we learn of a hitherto-undisclosed fifth voyage of Lemuel Gulliver, to a place called “Chicago” in 2022, and of the marvelous things that happened there. (14,298 words; Time: 47m)

Rating: ★★★★☆ Entertaining and Satisfying

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Paradise Regained, by Edward M. Lerner

Find this issue
(Colony-Planet SF) An ignorant young man and a stranded space ship race against time to find a way to fix the problems that make the human colony unsuccessful. (5,556 words; Time: 18m)

Rating: ★★★☆☆ Average

Friday, December 2, 2016

Turing de Force, by Edward M. Lerner

Find this book
(Hard SF) Two extraterrestrial AIs arrive in our solar system and try to decide whether human beings are intelligent. (3,756 words; Time: 12m)

Rating: ★★★★☆ Thought-provoking and amusing

Saturday, February 20, 2016

Soap Opera, by Edward M. Lerner

(Historical) In 1932 New York City, William works for a broadcasting company. (7,680 words)

Rating: NR, Not rated; no speculative element
 

Sunday, October 25, 2015

A Case of Identity, by Edward M. Lerner

Analog Science Fiction and Fact, December 2015; 7,456 words
Rating: 3, Good, ordinary, story

A quantum AI playing at detective is recruited by a young woman to investigate the disappearance of her fiance.

Mini-Review (click to view--possible spoilers)

Pro: This story is meant to look like a noir detective story from the 30s or 40s, and it does a decent job of that. It gives us enough hints to figure out that Sherlock was Apple reincarnated: Sherlock came into existence after Apple passed away. Sherlock thinks he can sense Apple's presence. Mary feels Apple's presence when she's talking to Sherlock. The fact that qMinds assemble themselves from things floating around the web. Even the fact that Apple transmitted a great deal of data before dying. The clues were all there.

Also like many of the noir mysteries, in the end we learn that someone is not who he/she seemed to be. In this case, though, it's the investigator himself.

The title refers to the Sherlock Holmes story, A Case of Identity, with which it shares many similarities.

Con: Although we have no idea how a qMind words, unless it violates the speed of light, it isn't likely to be anything like as fast as the narrator makes it out to be. This wouldn't matter except that he ruins the story by stopping every paragraph or two to give us a useless summary of how Sherlock passed the time waiting for the human to reply. This was okay once or twice, but it went on and on and on. Otherwise, this would be four stars.